My New Blog

  • Post #2

    From Perry Mason to The Frame: How a Childhood Obsession Became My First Legal Thriller

    Some of my earliest memories of being completely absorbed by a story happened in front of a television.

    I was a kid, sitting still longer than anyone expected, watching reruns of Perry Mason. I didn’t know much about the law, but I knew something important was happening. The courtroom felt serious. Words mattered. Silence mattered. And the calm, methodical way Mason dismantled seemingly airtight cases captured my imagination in a way nothing else on TV did.

    Every episode felt like a puzzle—one solved not with force, but with precision. A single question asked at exactly the right moment could change everything. That idea stayed with me.

    Looking back now, I honestly think I would have made a pretty good lawyer.

    I enjoy structure. I like evidence and logic. I’m drawn to problems that don’t have obvious answers and require patience, strategy, and persuasion to resolve. I’ve always been comfortable making an argument—especially when it’s rooted in facts and clarity rather than bluster. And I’ve long believed that the real power in the legal profession isn’t intimidation, but communication.

    But here’s the other side of that thought.

    Many of my close friends are lawyers, and over the years I’ve heard a surprisingly consistent refrain. They’re proud of what they do, but not always happy doing it. The stress never really shuts off. The hours are relentless. The adversarial nature of the work can grind you down. More than a few have admitted—sometimes late at night, sometimes half-joking—that if they had the chance to go back, they might choose a different path.

    That perspective matters.

    Because while I didn’t become a lawyer, the skills that might have made me a good one never went to waste. Being strong in English. Writing clearly and persuasively. Solving problems through conversation and analysis rather than confrontation. Understanding how facts can be framed, obscured, or weaponized depending on who controls the narrative.

    Those skills became the foundation of my fiction.

    Legal thrillers, at their best, aren’t really about statutes or procedure. They’re about people under pressure. They’re about truth colliding with power. They’re about how easily a life can unravel when a story—especially a false one—takes hold. And they’re about how difficult it is to claw your way back once the system turns against you.

    That’s exactly what led me to write The Frame, my first full effort in the genre.

    The Frame grew directly out of that lifelong fascination with the courtroom as both a battleground and a stage. It’s a story about how evidence can be arranged to look conclusive, how reputations can be destroyed before the truth ever has a chance to speak, and how one wrong narrative—once accepted—can feel impossible to escape.

    In many ways, writing the book felt like stepping into the world that first pulled me in as a kid—only this time, I was the one asking the questions.

    I didn’t become a lawyer. But I didn’t leave the courtroom behind either.

    I rebuilt it on the page, where I can explore the same tensions, stakes, and moral gray areas that fascinated me decades ago—without billable hours, and with the freedom to follow the truth wherever it leads, even when it gets uncomfortable.

    The Frame is just the beginning. But it’s a beginning rooted in a lifetime of curiosity about justice, language, and the stories we tell—and believe—about guilt and innocence.

  • How It All Began…

    I didn’t go to college to become a writer. I went for Electrical Engineering, the kind of major you pick when you want a clear plan, a solid job, and proof that you can solve hard problems.

    But stories kept following me. I read Thrillers the way some people watch storms from a porch, half-worried, half-excited, waiting for the next crack of lightning. I loved the snap of a great opening page and the way a simple choice can ruin a character’s whole life.

    This is the simple origin story of how a thrillers reader became a writer, starting with one moment in a college classroom. Beginnings matter because they change what you think is possible, even when you don’t see it yet.

    The moment that changed everything: a teacher spots talent

    The class wasn’t supposed to matter much to me. It wasn’t a lab. There were no circuits to test, no equations to balance. It was just an English class that was required no matter what your major.

    The assignment was the kind you get in any writing course: think of a real thing that happened to you, then put your thoughts on paper. Nothing flashy. No grand plan to publish. I approached it like an engineering problem, do the work, follow the rules, turn it in.

    Then the paper came back.

    There was feedback, the usual marks and notes, but one line stood out. My teacher didn’t just say it was “good.” She said there was real talent there. “Excellent” it read.

    It sounds small, but it didn’t feel small. It felt like a door clicked open in a hallway I didn’t know existed. Up to that point, writing was something I did when I had to. Reading was my secret habit. I tore through thrillers at night, then woke up and acted like I was only built for numbers.

    Her comment made me stop pretending.

    What hit me wasn’t praise for effort. It was the idea that my words had weight. That a stranger, someone paid to read student work all day, had noticed something that wasn’t just competence.

    I remember walking out of class with a weird mix of pride and fear. Pride because someone saw me. Fear because if it was true, then I had a choice to make. Talent isn’t comfortable. It asks you to risk looking foolish. (I still have that essay that I typed on my old Underwood typewriter!)

    That moment didn’t flip my life overnight. It wasn’t a movie scene. It was quieter than that, which is why it lasted. It sat in the back of my mind while I worked problem sets. It showed up when I opened a thriller and thought, “How did the author do that?”

    Why that one sentence hit so hard

    That single sentence did what the best thrillers do early on, it created a jolt. A shift. One minute the world is stable, the next minute it isn’t.

    Encouragement can work like a perfect hook. It gives you permission to try a different story about yourself. It also messes with your old certainty. If you’ve labeled yourself “not a creative person,” praise feels like evidence at a crime scene. You can’t ignore it once it’s there.

    It also gave me something I didn’t know I needed: a reason to take writing seriously. Not as a daydream, but as a skill worth building.

    The surprise mattered, too. When praise comes from the place you least expect, it lands harder. It sticks. It makes you replay it on the drive home, then again when you can’t sleep.

    The first steps after the compliment: reading, practice, and small risks

    After that, I started reading differently. I still read for fun, but now I watched the mechanics. I’d notice how a thriller chapter ends with a sharp question, or how a quiet scene plants one detail that later becomes a fuse.

    I wrote more, not because I had a big goal, but because I wanted to see if I could repeat that feeling my teacher pointed out. Some days it worked. Many days it didn’t. That was fine. Practice isn’t romantic, it’s repetition with a little hope mixed in.

    I also started taking small risks. I looked for places where writing was allowed to be imperfect, but public enough to feel real. A campus outlet. A workshop. A submission. Something with stakes low enough to survive, but high enough to feel my pulse.

    Feedback became the new fuel. When someone said, “This part dragged,” I didn’t take it as an insult. I took it like a reader shutting a book. That’s the blunt truth thrillers teach you early: attention is borrowed, and you have to earn it back every page.

    From Engineering to Journalism: choosing the story over the safe plan

    Switching majors wasn’t a dramatic rebellion. It was more like admitting what my habits already showed. I spent hours with circuits, but I spent my best energy thinking about people, choices, and consequences. I cared about what made someone lie, what made someone confess, what made someone run.

    So I switched to Journalism at the University of Arizona.

    On paper, it looked like moving from a safe track to a riskier one. In my head, it felt practical. Journalism had structure. It had deadlines. It had standards. It also had a built-in audience, real readers who didn’t owe you patience.

    Engineering still gave me plenty. It taught discipline, attention to detail, and how to break a big problem into smaller parts. Those skills didn’t vanish when I left. They just changed jobs.

    In journalism, the “problem” wasn’t a circuit. It was a messy human situation. The variables moved. People withheld facts. Some sources lied. Some told the truth but only in fragments.

    That was familiar territory for a thriller fan.

    I liked the idea that writing could be both creative and accountable. You had to make the story clear, but you couldn’t make things up. You had to move fast, but you couldn’t get sloppy. It scratched the same itch as thrillers, the pressure, the pacing, the constant question of what happens next.

    Choosing journalism also meant choosing discomfort. If engineering is often quiet struggle, reporting is public struggle. You pitch. You get rejected. You show up anyway. You learn to ask again, in a better way.

    What reporting taught that fiction still uses

    Reporting taught lessons I still see in every strong thriller:

     * Ask better questions: The first question gets the easy answer; the second gets the useful one.

     * Listen for what’s missing: Silence can be a clue, and so can a change in tone.

     * Verify details: A clean fact feels simple, but it’s earned.

     * Write a clear lead: Readers decide fast if they trust you.

     * Build tension with facts: Stakes don’t need hype, they need consequence.

    Thriller readers love speed, but not confusion. Reporting trains you to be sharp and plain at the same time, which is a gift in any genre that depends on momentum.

    How a reporting career turned into an advertising life, then back to books

    After journalism school, I worked as a newspaper reporter. It was real work, with real pressure. You learn quickly that stories don’t wait for you to feel ready. The phone rings, the editor wants answers, and the deadline doesn’t care about your mood. I wrote obituaries, police report updates, then finally a few special interest stories that actually won awards.

    That job taught me how to spot the heart of a story fast. Not the “biggest” fact, but the one that explains why anyone should care. In thrillers, that’s the moment a reader decides, “I’m in.”

    Later, my career moved into advertising, joining my father in creating an ad agency with just one client: A local car dealer. On the surface, it looked like a different world. Underneath, it was still the same problem: attention.

    Advertising is short-form storytelling with strict limits. You have to make choices. Every extra word costs you. Every vague claim loses you. You learn to respect the reader’s time, and you learn that curiosity is precious.

    It also teaches you to think about audience without chasing them. You can’t force anyone to care. You can only present something clear, human, and specific enough that it earns a response.

    Then came retirement, and with it, a quiet surprise. The noise drops, and the old interests get louder. The thrillers on my shelf didn’t just feel like entertainment anymore, they felt like home. The long path, engineering to journalism to newspapers to advertising, started to look like training.

    Not training for one job, but training for stories.

    And that’s where the takeaways start to matter, especially for readers who love thrillers and wonder how authors begin.

    Lessons for thriller readers: what to notice in an author’s origin story

    An author’s beginning isn’t trivia. It’s often a blueprint. A few things are worth watching for:

     * Early encouragement sticks: One honest comment can reroute a life.

     * Careers can zigzag: A “detour” often becomes the best material.

     * Real jobs shape the voice: Reporting sharpens clarity, advertising sharpens punch.

     * Beginnings show up in themes: Someone who learned pressure early often writes pressure well.

     * Reading habits leave fingerprints: If a writer grew up on thrillers, you’ll feel it in pace and stakes.

    Next time you finish a book you love, look up how that author started. You might spot the first spark hiding in plain sight.

    Conclusion

    Most beginnings aren’t planned. They’re small moments that refuse to go away. For me, it started with an English teacher who saw talent in a student who thought he was built for engineering.

    That one comment didn’t hand me a career, but it gave me direction. The rest was work, turns I didn’t predict, and a steady pull back to stories. If you love thrillers, you already understand how one moment can change everything.

    Now it’s your turn: what was the first thriller that hooked you, or the first person who told you your words mattered?